A world without insurance – Part 1 – The house always wins.
April 22, 2010
So what exactly constitutes gambling. One way to explain it is placing a bet on a future event. It is the same thing you do when you purchase insurance. Your placing your bet on a future event that may or may not happen. In this case the house is the insurance company. Who has the statistics to make sure they place the odds in their favour. Without the house advantage the insurance company could not stay in business let alone be able pay all it’s employees. And like casinos, insurance companies have huge buildings with loads of employees.
Most people can recognize that gambling is not a wise use of there money. Just based on the odds alone it would figure that it’s not a responsible use of money. It’s a way of trying to getting ahead without providing any real substance. Yes you can come out ahead but the house always has the better odds. This is what allows the house to stay in business. And if your winning to much you might be monitored carefully and seen as a possible cheat.
The biggest threat to the casinos and insurance companies are the big winners. So be careful, if your too savvy or you try to tilt the rules in your favour you are going to be dealt with suspicion if not outright resistance. If you get a big pay-off you must realize your threatening important profits of the house. You will likely be meat by the casino security guards or insurance lawyers. There to protect you of course.
Raw Milk vs. Pasteurized milk
February 21, 2010
Is Raw milk safe? Should farmers have the right to sell it? To me the bigger picture dictates this is a property rights issues and the government has no business pro-actively regulating use or sale of milk. That is if you believe in liberty vs a proactive, keep you safe, type government.
I think the real question people should be asking is, is pasteurized milk safe and how about any milk that comes from cows feed genitally altered food, shot up with hormones, antibiotics, or feed recycled meat. The solution of course has been to sanitize the milk by killing the organic value of the milk. Defeating the purpose of milk in my opinion. Raw milk is just the scape goat. The real problem is the unhealthy cows.
The place where I sometimes get raw milk has modern testing equipment to make sure the milk is safe. Not because they are forced to but because they will be held liable through the courts if something did happen. But my concern is not the milk I drink, it’s the stuff you buy in the grocery store store. Even the pasteurized organic stuff, witch seems to be ‘ultra’ pasteurized. What’s the point if you kill the enzymes in the milk? You know if people liked the taste of industrial waste we could just nuke it, infused in some vitimin D and call it milk 2.0 ….
Submission to Men?
April 16, 2009
“Those who already walk submissively will say there is no cause for alarm. But submissiveness is not our heritage. The First Amendment was designed to allow rebellion to remain as our Heritage. The Constitution was designed to keep the government off the backs of the people. The Bill of Rights was added to keep the precincts of belief and expression, of the press, of political and social activities free from surveillance. The Bill of Rights was designed to keep agents of government and official eavesdroppers away from Assemblies of People. The aim was to allow men to be free and independent to assert their rights against government.”
[Laird v. Tatum, 408 U.S. 1; 92 S.Ct. 2318 (1972)]
Who are the better financial planners?
July 22, 2008
3300 years ago Moses instructed our fathers. He said, “Thou shalt not have in thy bag divers weights, a great and a small. Thou shalt not have in thine house divers measures, a great and a small. [But] thou shalt have a perfect and just weight, a perfect and just measure shalt thou have ”.
Well our founding fathers at the constitutional convention in 1787 followed this scriptural principal of law. When they put into our constitution in article 1 section 10 these 17 words: “ no state should make anything but gold and silver coin a tender for payments of debts” but in 1933 President Roosevelt took our gold away and in 1964 President Johnson took silver coin out of circulation. In place of these just weights and balances these two presidents introduced our current practice of 1st 2nd and the 5th planks of the communist manifesto into our monetary system. And they gave us federal reserve notes in place of gold backed treasury bills and clad coinage in place of silver coins. Now in the intervening 70 years or so we Americans have gone from the worlds number one creditor nation, until today we are the worlds number one debtor nation. Now who do you think were the better financial planners for our nation, Moses and our founding fathers or Franklin D. Roosevelt and Lindon Banes Johnson?
- George Gordon
http://www.georgegordon.com/
Direct Link:http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5232639329002339531
Further explanation from Ron Paul
Direct Link: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1045924545087333822
Learn Your Constitution
June 21, 2008
These videos are a great way to learn about The Constitution. They are taught by Michael Badnarik, who in 2004 ran for President for the Libertarian Party.
http://www.archive.org/download/Mich…lass_Part1.wmv
http://www.archive.org/download/Mich…lass_Part2.wmv
http://www.archive.org/download/Mich…lass_Part3.wmv
http://www.archive.org/download/Mich…lass_Part4.wmv
http://www.archive.org/download/Mich…lass_Part5.wmv
http://www.archive.org/download/Mich…lass_Part6.wmv
http://www.archive.org/download/Mich…lass_Part7.wmv
If you would rather stream the videos, check out this site: http://www.archive.org/details/Michael_Badnarik
Government Takeover of the Church
June 21, 2008
Direct Link: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4096944125079342774
Additional Audio: http://www.switchpod.com/cats.php?a=10161